
-
-
The Rough-
Review of the Year This is the first annual report of The Rough-
For the off-
Area group activities suffered. Many events saw reduced attendance. Some charismatic group leaders have retired. It may take time for area group to recover.
Membership The Fellowship had 747 members on its roll at the end of 2001, a reduction of 20 over the year. This represents a considerable slowing in membership loss in comparison to recent years.
The Rough-
The new Editor stated , prior to his election, an intention to produce the journal quarterly, but with more pages per issue. The Directors reluctantly recorded a decision to that effect. With the changeover, five journals were published during 2001. Feedback to the Editor is on balance in favour of the thicker and more colourful journal. The Editor believes that this standard could not currently be maintained with more frequent publication. For the Editor, the main factor is the quantity of publishable material received. The Treasurer would refer to issues of cost and income.
Some officials and members expressed their concern over the reduction in journal
frequency of contact is crucial. The separation between editing and layout means
that the journal lead-
ww.rsf.org.uk John Whittaker reduced the cost of our web-
Marketing The main plank of the Committee’s efforts to stem, and hopefully reverse,
the decline in membership is the improved journal. The renewed web-
2001 has not been an easy year to attempt to market a British off-
Finance A loss of some £2,100 has been recorded, About £1,000 of this arises from the fifth journal in the year, which is not a recurring cost at the present quarterly pattern . About £300 represents transitional costs to the new journal format. The underlying loss is nearer £800.
At the AGM, the Treasurer said that a marked increased in subscriptions would be needed to avoid a recurrent loss. However some argued that a large increase would deter membership recovery. Members voted for a modest increase. Invested income fell as interest rates reduced , but new membership has increased and donations are more generous than expected.
The late Alan Pocklington managed the journal adverting income effectively. Heather Evans and John Matthews continued sterling work collecting membership income.
Signed: Norman R Hodgton, Simon C. Preston, Ivan Viehoff (Directors)